Preliminary Research on the Spatial Development Strategy of Ming-Qing Dynasty Historic Area in Xianyang City Based on the Spatial Gene Inheritance
-
摘要: 老城作为城市发展的起点和原点,有其独特的空间特征和文化价值,但多数老城面临空间特色消失、文化传承断裂的困境。协调老城发展与特色保护之间的关系,是我国老城目前亟需解决的问题。本文以陕西省咸阳市明清城为例,从空间基因视角出发,系统梳理明清城山水择址、礼制营城、斗杓套城的格局基因,庙台为心、街巷纵横、深宅窄院的肌理基因,渭水映城、商旅繁盛、庙堂鼎盛的记忆基因,分析总结明清城空间格局改变、街巷肌理破坏和文化记忆衰退的现实困境,最后从总体格局基因恢复、街巷院落基因延续、文化记忆基因传承三方面提出明清城发展策略,以期促进明清城空间高质量发展,为新时代具有历史文化底蕴的小城镇空间发展提供有益借鉴。Abstract: As the start and origin of urban development, old towns have their unique spatial characteristics and cultural value. However, most old towns face the dilemma of disappearance of spatial characteristics and fragmentation of cultural heritage. Old towns need to coordinate the relationship between development and protection. This article takes Ming-Qing Dynasty Historic Area of Xianyang City as an example to conduct spatial research. Firstly, it systematically sorts out the pattern, texture and memory genes of Ming-Qing Dynasty Historic Area from the perspective of spatial genes. The pattern genes of the district include the site selection, the special city shape, and the ancient methods of designing cities. The texture genes of the district include the location of important buildings, the system of streets and the unique courtyard mode. The memory genes include the relationship with Wei River, the memory of prosperous business and the scene of numerous temples. Then, it summarizes the development dilemma of Ming-Qing Dynasty Historic Area. It is manifested in three aspects:the change of spatial pattern, the destruction of the streets texture, and the decline of cultural memory. Finally, it proposes the development strategy of Ming-Qing Dynasty Historic Area from three aspects:restoration of the overall pattern, continuation of streets texture, and cultural memory inheritance. It is hoped to promote the high-quality development of urban space in Ming-Qing Dynasty Historic Area and provide useful reference for the spatial development of historical and cultural towns in the new era.
-
[1] 段进, 邵润青, 兰文龙, 等. 空间基因[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(2):14-21. [2] 陈旭, 王树声, 李小龙, 等. 端凝:一种凝神会心的人文空间规划设计方式[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(2):59-60. [3] 韩卫成, 高宇波, 要宇, 等. 基于整体保护的古城肌理修复方法研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(6):21-25. [4] 郑强羽. 咸阳古城风景营造的历史经验及其当代借鉴研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2012. [5] 郑孝燮. 中国古代城市形制"以理为本"的整体性[J]. 城乡建设, 2004(1):49-50. [6] 臧应桐. 咸阳县志[M]. 台北:台湾学生书局, 1967. [7] 周学红. 着眼于历史文化的总体城市设计研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2001. [8] 阿摩斯·拉普卜特.文化特性与建筑设计[M].常青, 译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2004. [9] 赵斌, 郭守印, 秦楠, 等. 基于传统城市肌理整合的建筑研究——以聊城古城区市民活动中心设计为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2017(12):108-118. [10] 王树声, 赵子良, 李小龙, 等. 并立联辉:一种并置人文标志提振城市格局秩序的规划手法[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(4):121-122. [11] 李小龙, 王树声, 赵子良, 等. 绾合:一种以人文节点凝结城市格局的规划手法[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(3):43-44. [12] 张向芳. 文化是一座城市的灵魂贯彻落实"10·15"文艺座谈会精神述评⑤[N]. 杭州日报, 2014-10-24(B4). [13] 杨保军. 用文化激活城市发展[EB/OL].(2019-01-22)[2021-05-10].http://www.chinajsb.cn/html/201901/22/1258.html. [14] 司马迁. 史记[M]. 李芳瑜, 译. 北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2015. [15] 催玲. 渭河水系廊道与古都西安城址变迁的关系研究[J]. 华中建筑, 2009(2):245-249. [16] 王树声. 黄河晋陕沿岸历史城市人居环境营造研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2006. [17] 刘合玲. 城市文化空间解读与利用——构建文化城市的新路径[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社, 2010. [18] 钟婷. 文化复兴视角下老城区发展策略——以成都青源城为例[J]. 上海城市规划, 2019(6):53-59.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 225
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0