Research on the Construction of Rural Organizations in China from the Perspective of the Urban and Rural Resources Flow: Based on the Experience of the European LEADER Project
-
摘要: 乡村社会组织是带领乡村发展的基础单元,也是左右城乡资源流动的直接环节。如何通过社会组织更高效地引导资本、资金等城市要素向乡村流动成为了我国乡村组织研究的重要方向。文章从流动路径和流动环境的角度分析目前我国资源向乡村流动中存在的固有困境,同时结合欧洲LEADER项目在近30年致力于通过在乡村建立“地方行动小组(Local Action Groups)”的方法促进城乡社会网络融合和激活地区内在潜力的经验,探索我国乡村组织在组织构成特征、不同治理模式下的组织功能和相应的发展策略方面可以参考借鉴的内容,并针对中国国情为我国未来的乡村组织架构方向提出建议。研究为解决我国城乡资源单向流动等问题提供了组织层面的参考意义。Abstract: Rural social organization is the basic unit that leads rural development and the direct link that controls the flow of urban and rural resources. How to guide capital, capital and other urban elements to flow to the countryside more efficiently through social organizations has become an important direction of rural organization research in China. From the perspective of flow path and flow environment, this paper analyzes the inherent dilemma of resource flow to the countryside in China. In combination with the European LEADER projects' almost 30 years' experience of promoting urban and rural social network integration and activation area inner potential through establishing ‘Local Action Group’, it explores the contents that can be used for reference in terms of organizational structure characteristics, organizational functions under different governance modes and corresponding development strategies of rural organizations in China. Finally, research puts forward some suggestions for China's future rural organizational construction based on China's national conditions. This study provides an organizational reference for solving the one-way flow of urban and rural resources in China.
-
Key words:
- rural revitalization /
- resource flow /
- LEADER project /
- local action group /
- organizational construction
-
[1] 陈斯佳, 张明生, 赖齐贤. 浙江乡村振兴十大典型模式分析[J]. 浙江农业科学,2020,61(2):390-394. [2] 胡占光. 乡村治理"余村经验":价值、扩散与深化[J]. 江南论坛,2020(2):12-14. [3] 肖方仁, 唐贤兴. 再组织视野下政策能力重构:乡村振兴的浙江经验[J]. 南京社会科学,2019(9):63-70. [4] 郭梦真. 基层扶贫队伍建设中存在的问题及对策建议——以遂溪县扶贫干部为分析样本[J]. 南方论刊,2020(4):68-70. [5] 陈美球, 廖彩荣, 刘桃菊. 乡村振兴、集体经济组织与土地使用制度创新——基于江西黄溪村的实践分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(2):27-34,158. [6] 新华网思客. 温铁军:中国农业如何从1.0向4.0演进[J]. 财经界,2016(7):80-83. [7] 蔡伏虹. 乡村振兴的路径选择:基于城镇化三重结构矛盾的省思[J]. 河北学刊,2020,40(3):168-173. [8] 贺雪峰. 新农村建设与中国道路[J]. 读书,2006(8):92-99. [9] 乔翠霞. 城乡协调发展视域下的资源要素流动问题研究:从微观机理到宏观效应[J]. 山东师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020,65(3):99-107. [10] 李壮壮, 牛香芹, 王彪. 精准扶贫背景下的贫困户致贫原因及其影响因素[J]. 安庆师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020,39(1):70-78. [11] 李永庆, 吴猛. 新型城镇化背景下农村社区居民参与的困境及其解构[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(6):88-91. [12] Ward N, Atterton J H,Kim T Y, et al. Universities, the knowledge economy and ‘neo-endogenous rural development’[R]. CRE Discussion Paper,2005. [13] 仝志辉, 韦潇竹. 通过集体产权制度改革理解乡村治理:文献评述与研究建议[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(1):148-158. [14] Galdeano-Gómez, E., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Pérez-Mesa, J. C.. The complexity of theories on rural development in Europe:an analysis of the paradigmatic case of Almería (South-east Spain)[J]. Sociologia Ruralis,2011,51(1):54-78. [15] Łukasz Sykała, Magdalena Dej, Oskar Wolski. The Leader Method:Transferring Experience of the Visegrad Group Countries to Georgia[M]. Krakow:Institute of Urban Development,2015. [16] Heseltine, L.M.No stone unturned:in pursuit of growth[EB/OL]].(2012-10-31)[2021-03-20].https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/34648/12-1213-no-stone-unturned-in-pursuit-of-growth.pdf. [17] Lukesch, R. The LAG handbook[Z],2007. [18] 秦红增. 乡村社会两类知识体系的冲突[J]. 开放时代, 2005(3):127-135. [19] 朱亚鹏, 刘云香. 制度环境、自由裁量权与中国社会政策执行——以C市城市低保政策执行为例[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版),2014,54(6):159-168. [20] Goodland R. The concept of environmental sustainability[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1995,26(1):1-24. [21] 张城国. 欧盟的农村发展实践——以LEADER系列计划为例[J]. 世界农业,2011(8):10-15. [22] Cañete J A, Navarro F, Cejudo E. Territorially unequal rural development:the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain)[J]. European Planning Studies,2018,26(4):726-744.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 172
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0