Research on the Path of Spatial Reconstruction of Rural Production-Ecology-Living Space in the Canal Basin: Taking Nanxiakou Town in Cangzhou, Hebei as an Example
-
摘要: 中国大运河的成功申遗,为运河流域乡村地区的振兴发展带来机遇,与此同时,运河流域乡村空间发展困境和振兴需求也成为社会多方关注的重点。运河流域广袤的乡村地区拥有独特的绿色生态和文化历史,是三生空间相互交融、相互关联及相互依托的地域。但长期的城乡二元体制下,运河流域乡村出现生态环境恶化、传统农业衰退、青壮劳力流失等乡村空间发展问题,亟需进行乡村空间重构路径研究。基于此,本文分析总结运河流域乡村三生空间的现状特征,在此基础上,针对乡村三生空间发展的现实困境与发展要求,提出通过科学划定生态保护红线、构建生态廊道、严控污染排放优化生态空间;通过优化居民点布局、完善公服配套优化生活空间;通过规模化生产、发展运河特色产业的方式优化生产空间;通过协调融合乡村三生空间引导乡村振兴。并选取镇域乡村进行实例分析,以期为更大范围运河流域乡村三生空间的重构优化提供有益参考。Abstract: The successful application for the world heritage of The Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal brings opportunities for the revitalization and development of rural areas in the canal basin. At the same time, the plight of rural space development and the revitalization needs of the canal basin have become the focus of social attention. The vast rural area in the canal basin has a unique green ecological and cultural history. It is a region where the production-ecology-living space blend, relate and rely on each other. However, under the long-term urban-rural dual system, rural space development problems such as the deterioration of ecological environment, the decline of traditional agriculture, the loss of young and strong labor force and so on, need to study the path of rural space reconstruction. Based on this, paper analyzes and summarizes the current situation and characteristics of the ‘rural production-ecology-living spaces’ in the canal basin. On this basis, in view of the practical difficulties and new requirements of the development of ‘rural production-ecology-living spaces’. It is proposed that the ecological space should be optimized by scientifically delimiting the ecological protection red line, constructing the ecological corridor, repairing the weak ecological space and strictly controlling the pollution discharge; and we should optimize the production space by means of large-scale production and the development of canal characteristic industries, and guide the rural revitalization by coordinating and integrating the rural three living spaces. In order to provide a useful reference for the reconstruction and optimization of the rural production-ecology-living space in the canal basin in a larger scope, the town village is selected for example analysis.
-
[1] 刘志超. 新型空间规划体系下的县级"三生空间"布局与"三线"划定[J]. 规划师,2019,35(5):27-31. [2] 朴佳子. 乡村振兴战略下村庄"三生空间"规划探索与实践[J]. 北京规划建设,2019(4):85-88. [3] 宋春花, 王伟. 运河文化遗产与美丽乡村建设融合分析[J]. 农村经济与科技,2020,31(16):219-220. [4] 谭敏, 陈浮, 张敏, 等. 基于"三生"空间的乡村综合评析及重构路径研究——以徐州市姚集镇为例[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(4):302-307. [5] 梁肇宏,范建红,雷汝林.基于空间生产的乡村"三生空间"演变及重构策略研究——以顺德杏坛北七乡为例[J]. 现代城市研究,2020(7):17-24. [6] 武联, 余侃华, 鱼晓惠, 等. 秦巴山区典型乡村"三生空间"振兴路径探究——以商洛市花园村乡村振兴规划为例[J]. 规划师,2019,35(21):45-51. [7] 曾鹏, 朱柳慧, 蔡良娃. 基于三生空间网络的京津冀地区镇域乡村振兴路径[J]. 规划师,2019,35(15):60-66. [8] 杨俊, 张鹏, 李争. 乡村"三生"空间综合评价与空间优化研究[J]. 国土资源科技管理,2019,36(4):117-130. [9] 扈万泰, 王力国, 舒沐晖. 城乡规划编制中的"三生空间"划定思考[J]. 城市规划,2016,40(5):21-26,53. [10] 刘丰华. 基于"三生空间"协调的西安市乡村空间布局优化研究[D]. 西安:长安大学,2019. [11] 钱振华. 大运河文化带建设与乡村振兴融合发展探路[J]. 江苏农村经济,2020(5):62-63. [12] 宋春花, 王伟, 牟楠. 新时期运河文化建设与乡村振兴探讨[J]. 农村经济与科技,2020,31(10):249-250. [13] 沈孟樱, 王逸菲. 乡村振兴战略下运河地带新农村建设困境研究[J]. 农村实用技术,2020(4):3-4. [14] 李裕瑞, 卜长利, 曹智, 等. 面向乡村振兴战略的村庄分类方法与实证研究[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(2):243-256. [15] 曾鹏, 任晓桐, 李晋轩. 空间治理背景下乡村发展路径的转型与创新[J]. 小城镇建设,2020,38(8):5-11.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2020.08.002. [16] 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(4):563-576. [17] 张红娟, 李玉曼. 北方平原地区"三生空间"评价及优化策略研究[J]. 规划师,2019,35(10):18-24.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 310
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0