Research on Spatial Distribution and Accessibility of Primary Schools in Ethnic Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Shiping County, Yunnan Province
-
摘要: 文章针对民族山区教育资源供给不均等和优质教育分布不均衡的问题,以云南省红河州石屏县为例,采用密度分析法和改进的潜能模型分析其小学的空间布局与空间可达性。研究表明:石屏县小学空间分布与人口密度、道路网密度密切相关,且受地形条件影响,主要分布于微斜坡、缓斜坡和斜坡区域;小学服务能力差距悬殊,山区民族小学服务能力整体低于坝区非少数民族地区,教育质量好的小学也向坝区倾斜;小学空间可达性整体较低,少数民族聚居区空间可达性更低;空间可达性高值区位于异龙—宝秀两镇交界处的坝区,次高值区位于石屏县城区和宝秀镇镇区及其辐射的地势平坦区域,低值区分布在哨冲镇、龙朋镇、大桥乡与宝秀镇东部等连片山区。基于此,本文对石屏县小学的合理布局与空间优化提出针对性建议,以期为民族山区教育设施均等化规划提供一定的借鉴。Abstract: Aiming at the problem of unequal supply of educational resources and uneven distribution of high-quality education in ethnic mountainous areas, taking Shiping County in ethnic mountainous areas as an example, the density analysis method and improved potential model are used to analyze the spatial layout and spatial accessibility of primary schools. Research shows that the spatial distribution of primary schools is closely related to population density and road network density, and is affected by topographical conditions. They are mainly distributed in areas with micro slopes, gentle slopes and slopes. There is a huge gap in the service capacity of primary schools. The overall service capacity of ethnic primary schools in mountainous areas is lower than that of nonethnic minority areas in the flatland area, and the primary schools with good education quality are also inclined to the flatland area. Primary schools space accessibility is generally low, and that in minority communities is even lower. The high value area for spatial accessibility is located in the flatland area at the junction of Yilong Town and Baoxiu Town. The second high value area is located in the urban area of Shiping County and Baoxiu township and its radiated flat terrain. The low-value areas are distributed in contiguous mountainous areas such as Shaochong Town, Longpeng Town, Daqiao Town and the eastern part of Baoxiu Town. Based on this, specific suggestions are made for the rational layout and space optimization of primary schools, in order to provide reference for the equalization planning of educational facilities in ethnic mountainous areas.
-
[1] 罗震东, 韦江绿, 张京祥. 城乡基本公共服务设施均等化发展的界定、特征与途径[J]. 现代城市研究,2011,26(7):7-13. [2] 汤鹏飞, 向京京, 罗静, 等. 基于改进潜能模型的县域小学空间可达性研究——以湖北省仙桃市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017,36(6):697-708. [3] 张京祥, 葛志兵, 罗震东, 等. 城乡基本公共服务设施布局均等化研究——以常州市教育设施为例[J]. 城市规划,2012,36(2):9-15. [4] 任梦云, 程钢. 城市教育设施的可达性分析——以龙岗区小学为例[J]. 地理信息世界,2019,26(4):61-67,73. [5] 张玉婷, 孙建国, 杜立钊, 等. 六盘山地区中学教育资源空间可达性分析[J]. 测绘科学,2019,44(11):52-58,87. [6] 韩增林, 董梦如, 刘天宝, 等. 社区生活圈基础教育设施空间可达性评价与布局优化研究——以大连市沙河口区为例[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(11):1774-1783. [7] 涂然, 周锐, 王新军. 城市基础教育设施的空间可达性与公平性研究——以上海市浦西8区小学为例[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版),2019,58(6):747-755. [8] 吕毅. 城市小学校可达性评价——以长沙市雨花区为例[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2005. [9] 张鲜鲜, 李久生, 赵媛, 等. 南京市高级中学可达性及空间分布特征研究[J]. 测绘科学,2015,40(11):111-114,186. [10] 周子懿. 学区划分背景下的小学布点规划评价与优化研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2015. [11] 丁秋贤, 朱丽霞, 罗静. 武汉市养老设施空间可达性分析[J]. 人文地理,2016,31(2):36-42. [12] 程敏, 连月娇. 基于改进潜能模型的城市医疗设施空间可达性——以上海市杨浦区为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2018,37(2):266-275. [13] Hansen W G. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1959,25(2):73-76. [14] 宋正娜, 陈雯. 基于潜能模型的医疗设施空间可达性评价方法[J]. 地理科学进展,2009,28(6):848-854. [15] Joseph A E, Bantock P R. Measuring Potential Physical Accessibility to General Practitioners in Rural Areas:A Method and Case Study[J]. Social Science & Medicine,1982,16(1):85-90. [16] 宋正娜, 陈雯, 车前进, 等. 基于改进潜能模型的就医空间可达性度量和缺医地区判断——以江苏省如东县为例[J]. 地理科学,2010,30(2):213-219. [17] 汤鹏飞. 湖北省仙桃市农村基础教育服务可达性与均等化研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学,2017. [18] 彭展. 农村中小学可达性与空间布局优化研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学,2012. [19] 孙璇. 江汉平原义务教育学校可达性与空间布局优化研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学,2016. [20] Peeters D, Thomas I. Distance Predicting Functions and Applied Location-allocation Models[J]. Journal of Geographical Systems,2000,2(2):167-184. [21] 刘斌涛, 陶和平, 刘邵权, 等. 山区交通通达度测度模型与实证研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2011,30(6):733-738.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 221
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0