多功能演化视角下乡村韧性的作用机制与治理路径探讨

薛雯露; 武前波

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2023.01.012

多功能演化视角下乡村韧性的作用机制与治理路径探讨

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2023.01.012

薛雯露^,,
武前波

浙江工业大学设计与建筑学院

基金项目:

浙江省哲学社会科学规划专项课题“推进农业农村现代化研究——以浙江为例”（编号：22LLXC08YB）；国家社会科学基金一般项目“新科技革命下我国创新城市的驱动机制与路径策略研究”（编号：19BJY067）。

详细信息

作者简介:
薛雯露,浙江工业大学设计与建筑学院硕士研究生。

武前波,浙江工业大学设计与建筑学院教授。

通讯作者:
薛雯露,2112115022@zjut.edu.cn。

中图分类号: TU982.29
计量
- 文章访问数: 244
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-05-15

Discussion on the Mechanism of Action and Governance Path of Rural Resilience from the Perspective of Multi-functional Evolution

XUE Wenlu^,,
WU Qianbo

摘要

摘要: 近年来各类自然及社会灾害频发，我国乡村经济社会环境面临急剧变化，存在着巨大扰动与潜在风险的威胁。当前有关乡村韧性的研究受到国内外政府、社会及学界的广泛关注，我国现有乡村韧性研究仍处于初级阶段，特别是还未考虑到乡村多功能演化背后的复杂内涵。本文首先通过演化视角展现乡村韧性的动态发展变化特征，将乡村多功能化发展的现象表征与中国“特色”理论概念相融合，实现对乡村概念内涵的联系推演，进而识别出乡村韧性研究所需关注的核心要点。其次，针对乡村人地关系复杂的社会—生态系统，从“扰动压力—系统状态—主体响应”三部分进行韧性作用机制的具体阐述。最后，对应于韧性作用的不同层面，分别从“扰动预测—状态适应—主体响应”三方面探讨乡村韧性适应性治理提升的路径策略，为我国乡村韧性理论研究与乡村建设提供借鉴参考。
- 乡村韧性 /
- “三生”理念 /
- 多功能乡村 /
- 乡村地域系统 /
- 韧性治理
Abstract: In recent years, all kinds of disasters occur frequently. Besides, China's rural society changes rapidly, rural areas are facing great disturbance and potential risks. In this context, the study of rural resilience has attracted extensive attention from the government and academia. The existing research on rural resilience in China is still at its initial stage and has not considered the complex connotation behind the evolution of rural multi-function. First of all, this paper presents the dynamic development characteristic of rural resilience from the perspective of evolution, and integrates the phenomenon representation of rural multi-functional development with the concept of Chinese ‘characteristics’, realizes the connection of conceptual connotations, and then identifies the core points that need to be paid attention to in resilience research. Secondly, based on the above points, the mechanism of resilience in rural areas, a social ecosystem with complex man-land relationship, is elaborated from three parts:disturbance pressure, system state, and subject response. Finally, corresponding to different parts of the role of resilience, the path strategies of improving resilience adaptability governance in rural areas was discussed from three aspects:disturbance prediction, state adaptation, and resilience response, which provide references for theoretical research on rural resilience and rural construction in China.
- rural resilience /
- the ecological-production-living theory /
- multifunctional village /
- rural area system /
- resilience governance

HTML全文

参考文献(33)

[1]	房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨--超越"现代化"发展范式[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(2):257-270.
[2]	魏艺."韧性"视角下乡村社区生活空间适应性建构研究[J]. 城市发展研究,2019,26(11):50-57.
[3]	Gerlitz J Y, Macchi M, Brooks N, et al. The Multidimensional Livelihood Vulnerability Index-An Instrument to Measure Livelihood Vulnerability to Change in the Hindu Kush Himalayas[J]. Climate and Development,2017,9(2):124-140.
[4]	Fang Y, Zhu F, Qiu X, et al. Effects of Natural Disasters on Livelihood Resilience of Rural Residents in Sichuan[J]. Habitat International,2018(76):19-28.
[5]	李红波. 韧性理论视角下乡村聚落研究启示[J]. 地理科学, 2020,40(4):556-562.
[6]	王成, 任梅菁, 胡秋云, 等. 乡村生产空间系统韧性的科学认知及其研究域[J]. 地理科学进展,2021,40(1):85-94.
[7]	Wilson G A, Hu Z, Rahman S. Community Resilience in Rural China:The Case of Hu Village, Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2018(60):130-140.
[8]	Wilson G A, Schermer M, Stotten R. The Resilience and Vulnerability of Remote Mountain Communities:The Case of Vent, Austrian Alps[J]. Land Use Policy,2018(71):372-383.
[9]	黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2017,36(3):378-391.
[10]	Darnhofer I. Resilience and Why it Matters for Farm Management[J]. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2014,41(3):461-484.
[11]	Walker B, Holling C S, Carpenter S R, et al. Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems[J]. Ecology and Society,2004,9(2).
[12]	颜文涛, 卢江林. 乡村社区复兴的两种模式:韧性视角下的启示与思考[J]. 国际城市规划,2017,32(4):22-28.
[13]	乔杰, 洪亮平. 从"关系"到"社会资本":论我国乡村规划的理论困境与出路[J]. 城市规划学刊,2017(4):81-89.
[14]	Voutilainen O, Wuori O. Rural Development within the Context of Agricultural and Socio-economic Trends-the Case of Finland[J]. European Countryside,2012,4(4):283-302.
[15]	马历, 龙花楼, 屠爽爽, 等. 基于乡村多功能理论的贫困村域演变特征与振兴路径探讨--以海南省什寒村为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2019,38(9):1435-1446.
[16]	刘玉, 刘彦随. 乡村地域多功能的研究进展与展望[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(10):164-169.
[17]	Cutter S L, Barnes L, Berry M, et al. A Place-based Model for Understanding Community Resilience to Natural Disasters[J]. Global Environmental Change,2008,18(4):598-606.
[18]	王俊,孙晶,杨新军,等.基于NDVI的社会-生态系统多尺度干扰分析--以甘肃省榆中县为例[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(3): 1622-1628.
[19]	Wildavsky A B. Searching for Safety (Vol.10)[M]. New Jersey:Transaction Publishers,1988.
[20]	宋爽, 王帅, 傅伯杰, 等. 社会-生态系统适应性治理研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(11):2401-2410.
[21]	乔路, 李京生. 论乡村规划中的村民意愿[J]. 城市规划学刊,2015(2):72-76.
[22]	王桂亭. 台湾社区营造政策20年发展刍议[J]. 台湾研究集刊,2016(1):95-102.
[23]	沈费伟. 数字乡村韧性治理的建构逻辑与创新路径[J]. 求实,2021(5):72-84,111.
[24]	刘彦随, 朱琳, 李玉恒. 转型期农村土地整治的基础理论与模式探析[J]. 地理科学进展,2012,31(6):777-782.
[25]	吕德文. 乡村治理70年:国家治理现代化的视角[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(4):11-19,156.
[26]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(4):637-650.
[27]	李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 刘彦随. 基于乡村弹性的乡村振兴理论认知与路径研究[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(10):2001-2010.
[28]	Huggins R. Inter-firm Network Policies and Firm Performance:Evaluating the Impact of Initiatives in the United Kingdom[J]. Research Policy,2001,30(3):443-458.
[29]	Kulig J C. Community Resiliency:The Potential for Community Health Nursing Theory Development[J]. Public Health Nursing,2000,17(5):374-385.
[30]	胡航军, 张京祥."超越精明收缩"的乡村规划转型与治理创新--国际经验与本土化建构[J]. 国际城市规划,2022,37(3): 50-58.
[31]	杨亚妮. 我国乡村建设实践的价值反思与路径优化[J]. 城市规划学刊,2021(4):112-118.
[32]	McIntosh A, Stayner R, Carrington K, et al. Resilience in Rural Communities:literature Review[M]. London:University of New England-Centre for Applied Research in Social Science,2008.
[33]	万成伟, 宋代军. 可持续的乡村振兴规划建设模式--基于海峡两岸的案例比较[J]. 城市规划,2022,46(6):90-102.