公众参与在乡村景观规划中的实践与意义——以贵州省铜仁市木黄镇凤仪村村庄规划为例

Analysis of the Practice and Significance of Rural Landscape Participatory Planning: A Case Study of Fengyi Village in Muhuang Town, Guizhou Province

  • 摘要: 自村庄规划法定化以来,规划工作重点大多聚焦于可建设的空间与设施,对于展现村庄完整风土人情的景观空间则缺乏重视,但随着《乡村振兴战略规划(2018—2022年)》的颁布及国土空间规划工作的全面开展,乡村景观空间对于村庄文脉传承、产业发展的价值逐步得到重视,是重要的公众型资源。在村庄规划具体工作中,以多元主体为对象的公众参与帮助形成地方文化与外部思想融合的平台, 对乡村景观保护与利用起到重要作用,形成了行之有效的反馈机制。本文以贵州省铜仁市木黄镇凤仪村 村庄规划为例,从参与主体、参与阶段和方式、参与结果三方面解析公众参与对于乡村景观规划实践的指导意义与不足之处,即:规划工作团队协同政府部门作为公众参与的重要组织方,承担宣传和引导工作; 村民作为公众主体的核心,其参与有效地保留了地方特色景观,切实维护了地方文脉;就参与主体及结果而言,主体的多元度还须提升,可纳入游客、非政府组织和乡村产业相关团队,同时需要在村庄规划实施与评估反馈阶段继续跟进。

     

    Abstract: After the legalization of the village planning, most of the work focuses on the space and facilities that can be built, but little attention is paid to the landscape area which together with the built environment shows the complete local conditions and customs of the village. With the promulgation of the Strategic Planning for Rural Revitalization (2018-2022) and the comprehensive carry out of Territorial Development Planning, the value of rural landscape space for the inheritance of village context and industrial development has gradually received spotlight. In the specific work of village planning, the public participation with multiple subjects helps to form a platform for the integration of local culture and external thoughts, which plays an important role in the protection and utilization of rural landscape and forms an effective feedback mechanism. Taking Fengyi Village in the town of Muhuang, Guizhou Province as an example, this article analyses the significance and shortage of participatory planning of rural landscape from the perspective of participation stage, subject, method and results, which reaches the following conclusions. Professional planning teams cooperating with local government departments undertake management and guidance work. As the core of the public, the participation of villagers effectively preserves the landscape with local characteristics and practically maintains the local context. As far as the participants and the results are concerned, the disadvantage lies in the multi-element degree of the participants which should be improved, and could include the relevant rural industry teams, tourists and NGO. Meanwhile, it is essential to make participatory methods follow up in the stage of village planning implementation and evaluation feedback.

     

/

返回文章
返回