乡村振兴背景下村庄自然资源适应性评价研究——以漳州市金山镇为例

Research on the Adaptability Assessment of Village Natural Resources in the Context of Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Jinshan Town in Zhangzhou City

  • 摘要: 在乡村振兴积极推进的背景下,我国乡村资源的独特优势和乡村发展面临的一系列挑战成为研究的焦点。深入了解乡村的自然、社会和人文资源特征,评估乡村可持续发展的本底条件及其面临的内外风险,是当前乡村问题研究的关键议题。研究在构建乡村自然资源禀赋与乡村振兴水平评价指标体系的基础上,采用综合评价及耦合分析方法对福建省漳州市南靖县金山镇村落自然资源本底现状、乡村振兴发展程度及两者间的适应性特征进行探索。结果显示,特色保护类村落的自然资源禀赋与乡村振兴水平均较高,两系统间的适应性水平均处于初级协调状态;聚集提升类村落自然资源禀赋与乡村振兴水平一般,整体适应性水平趋于勉强协调状态;拆迁撤并类村落自然资源禀赋与乡村振兴水平较差,整体适应性水平趋于濒临失调状态。基于以上结果,研究将村落分为适应性高、适应性一般、适应性较差和适应性极差4类,并对后续乡村振兴路径展开针对性讨论,旨在为自然资源开发利用与乡村振兴发展提供解决思路。

     

    Abstract: With the vigorous promotion of rural revitalization, the unique advantages of China's rural resources and the challenges facing rural development have become the focus of research. A comprehensive understanding of rural natural, social, and cultural resources, along with an assessment of the baseline conditions for sustainable rural development and the internal and external risks it faces, is a critical issue in current rural studies. Based on the construction of an evaluation index system for rural natural resource endowment and the level of rural revitalization, this study utilizes comprehensive evaluation and coupling analysis methods to explore the current status of village natural resources, the level of rural revitalization, and the adaptive characteristics between the two. The results indicate that villages categorized as characteristic-protected exhibit high levels of natural resource endowment and rural revitalization, with the adaptability level between these systems tending towards an initial coordinated state. Aggregation and enhancement-type villages generally possess moderate natural resource endowment and rural revitalization levels, with the overall adaptability tending towards a barely coordinated state. Conversely, villages designated for relocation and consolidation display poor natural resource endowment and rural revitalization levels, with the overall adaptability tending towards the brink of imbalance. Based on these findings, the villages are categorized into four groups: high adaptability, moderate adaptability, low adaptability, and extremely low adaptability. Targeted discussions on subsequent rural revitalization pathways are conducted, aiming to provide solutions for the exploitation and utilization of natural resources and the promotion of rural revitalization development.

     

/

返回文章
返回