城郊融合型村庄“规建治”一体化路径及策略——以合肥市六家畈社区为例

Integrated Pathways and Strategies for ’Planning-Construction-Governance’ in Suburban Fusion Villages:A Case Study of Liujiafan Community, Hefei City

  • 摘要: 城郊融合型村庄因其“似城非城,似乡非乡”的特殊性,是完善城乡结构秩序、统筹城乡功能布局的主要载体,成为城乡融合发展的前沿阵地。但现有实践中也出现了规划割裂、建设分治和治理多头等问题,“规划—建设—治理”的割裂也暴露出当前国土空间规划村级实践存在的矛盾与局限,缺乏系统性、一体化的运行治理,亟待探索融合新路径。本文对安徽省合肥市肥东县长临河镇六家畈社区城郊融合型村庄规划展开实证研究,基于二元结构向城乡一体化目标,提出“规建治”一体化发展路径和实践范式,在规划体系上,变技术手段为管控机制,从多层级规划入手倡导动态统筹;在建设要素方面,强调整体主义下的内容协调,通过多项目的稳态推进,实现融合发展的落地;在治理层面,以政府、村民、市场等多元治理的倡导取代了单一主体的机会主义,贯穿全过程的往复博弈在平台和政策资金的保障下,发挥出最大合力。

     

    Abstract: Suburban fusion villages, defined by their ’semi-urban yet not fully urbanized, rural yet not entirely traditional’ characteristics, act as pivotal platforms for optimizing urban-rural structural order and coordinating functional layouts. They have emerged as frontier zones for integrated urban-rural development. However, current practices encounter challenges including fragmented planning, disjointed construction management, and multiheaded governance. The disconnect among planning-construction-governance(PCG) processes exposes contradictions and systemic limitations in village-level territorial spatial planning, underscoring a lack of cohesive, integrated operational governance. This gap necessitates urgent exploration of novel integration pathways. This paper presents an empirical analysis of suburban fusion village planning in Liujiafan Community, Changlinhe Town, Feidong County, Hefei City, Anhui Province. Grounded in the transition from a dual urban-rural structure toward integrated urban-rural development, it proposes an integrated PCG development framework and practical paradigm.In the context of planning systems, technical tools evolve into regulatory frameworks that emphasize dynamic coordination through multi-level planning. Regarding construction components, holistic content integration is prioritized, with systematic progress achieved through parallel project implementation to operationalize integrated development. At the governance level, single-actor opportunism is supplanted by a multi-stakeholder governance model engaging governments, local communities, and market entities. Throughout the process, reciprocal negotiations facilitated by institutional platforms and policy-backed funding mechanisms ensure the optimization of collaborative synergies.

     

/

返回文章
返回