基于地方特点的村庄分类方法研究及规划实践——以陇南市马营镇为例

Research on Village Classification Methods and Planning Practice Based on Local Characteristics:Taking Maying Town in Longnan City as an Example

  • 摘要: 科学开展村庄分类是编制和传导乡镇国土空间规划的必要环节,是编制村庄规划的前提,也是精准实施乡村振兴战略的基础。我国幅员辽阔,不同地区存在明显差异,基于地方特点的村庄分类方法对于能否把握实际情况、响应发展诉求、推动乡村振兴尤为关键。对国内外村庄分类方法从因素选取和量化方法两方面进行比较,发现大多侧重构建评价指标体系,一般包含自然、人文、经济等常规因素,但较少突出地方特点,存在指标选取不全面、权重分配不合理、忽视村民意愿等问题。在此基础上,提出“n+X”的评价因素选取模式,“n”为自然资源、人口聚落、社会经济、村庄建设等常规因素,“X”为历史文化、地形特征、地质灾害等凸显地方特点的非常规因素,共同组成一级因子,运用AHP法确定各指标的相对权重,并构建村庄发展潜力评价模型。以甘肃省陇南市马营镇国土空间规划为例,构建了包括6个一级因子和10个二级因子的村庄评价指标体系,运用GIS平台进行空间叠加分析得出村庄发展潜力评价结果,将24个行政村划分为城郊融合类、集聚提升类、其他类和搬迁撤并类4个类型,针对当地地灾易发多发的特点,进一步提出“地质灾害一票否决制”,为下一步编制实用性村庄规划提供指导。

     

    Abstract: Scientifically conducting village classification is an indispensable component for formulating and implementing township territorial and spatial planning, serving as a prerequisite for rural planning and the foundation for targeted execution of the rural revitalization strategy. Given China’s vast territory with significant regional disparities, place-specific classification methods are critical to accurately capturing local realities, addressing development demands, and advancing rural revitalization. Through comparative analysis of domestic and international approaches-focusing on factor selection and quantification techniques-it is observed that most studies prioritize constructing evaluation index systems. While these typically incorporate conventional factors(e.g., natural, humanistic, economic dimensions), they frequently overlook distinctive local characteristics, resulting in incomplete indicator coverage, unbalanced weighting allocations, and neglect of villagers’ aspirations. To address these limitations, an ’n+X’ factor-selection model was developed: ’n’ denotes conventional factors(natural resources, population settlement, socio-economic conditions, village infrastructure), while ’X’ signifies unconventional factors(historical culture, topographic traits, geological hazards), collectively forming primary indicators. The Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) was applied to determine relative indicator weights, establishing a village development potential assessment model. In the case study of Maying Town, Longnan City, Gansu Province, an evaluation index system comprising 6 primary and 10 secondary indicators was constructed. Spatial overlay analysis via GIS yielded village development potential assessments, classifying 24 villages into four typologies: suburban-integrated, clusterenhanced, other, and relocation/merger. Given the locality’s high susceptibility to geological hazards, a ’one-vote veto’ mechanism against geological disaster risks was instituted to guide subsequent practical rural planning.

     

/

返回文章
返回