“五好”园区建设视域下产业园区土地集约利用评价与反思

Evaluation and Reflection on Intensive Land Use in Industrial Parks Based on the Construction of ‘Five-Excellence' Industrial Parks

  • 摘要: 在湖南省“五好”园区建设背景下,本研究以湖南省G高新技术产业开发区为例,评价其土地集约利用水平并反思园区发展的结构性矛盾。研究发现,园区虽综合集约度较高,但存在“高土地占用—低经济产出”的粗放模式,产业层次偏低与要素配置扭曲是主因。潜力分析显示扩展潜力主导,结构与强度潜力近乎为零,反映出现行政策依赖增量供给、存量优化机制缺失的问题。研究指出,这些矛盾本质上是空间生产逻辑与高质量发展需求的冲突。最后提出整合空间生产与精明增长理论,从产业链供地、绩效监管、碳预算、多元共治及产业地图等方面,推动园区空间治理与制度创新。

     

    Abstract: In the context of the pilot construction of the ‘five-excellence' industrial park in Hunan Province, this study takes G High-Tech Industrial Development Zone as an example. It evaluates the level of intensive land use in the park through the construction of a systematic evaluation method and reflects on the structural contradictions and optimization paths in the current construction of industrial parks. Research has found that although the comprehensive intensity of the park has reached a high intensity, there is a significant imbalance between the average tax revenue per unit of industrial land and the industrial land utilization rate, exposing the extensive model of ‘high land occupation but low economic output', which is rooted in the low industrial level and distorted factor allocation. The potential calculation shows that the expansion potential dominates, while the structural potential and intensity potential are almost zero, reflecting the excessive dependence of administrative policies on incremental supply and the lack of stock optimization mechanisms. Analysis shows that these issues are essentially a conflict between the logic of spatial production and the demand for high-quality development, manifested as rigid constraints on industrial dynamics in planning, single institutional tools that inhibit subject collaboration, and a disconnect between evaluation systems and digital and low-carbon goals. Finally, based on the integration framework of spatial production theory and smart growth theory, suggestions are proposed to enhance spatial governance efficiency through industrial chainbased land supply and dynamic performance supervision, promote institutional innovation through industrial land carbon budgeting and diversified governance platforms, and empower digital transformation through industrial maps and mixed land use models.

     

/

返回文章
返回